Philanthrocapitalism—the strategic application of market methods and motives for philanthropic purposes—plays increasingly prominent roles in policy design and implementation at national and international levels. Notwithstanding philanthrocapitalism's growing significance, relevant scholarly discourse remains limited and fragmented. Drawing together diverse debates, our paper systematically reviews and synthesizes academic literature on philanthrocapitalism. Alongside raising questions about the casting and practice of philanthropy, the 186 relevant publications included in our review indicate a strong emphasis of philanthrocapitalism in the areas of education, international development, healthcare and agriculture. Across these, we identify and discuss the importance of three cultural frames: (1) development challenges being framed as scientific problems; (2) beneficiaries being framed as productive entrepreneurs; and (3) philanthropy being framed as social investment. Outlining and critically examining these issues, this work contributes: a comprehensive analysis of key debates and issues; strengthened conceptual clarity and nuance through an evaluative exploration of the multiple interpretations of philanthrocapitalism; and a future research agenda to address persisting knowledge gaps and refine focus.

中文翻译：

---

“你被陷害了”：对慈善资本主义学术话语的批判性评论

慈善资本主义——市场方法和动机为慈善目的的战略应用——在国家和国际层面的政策设计和实施中发挥着越来越突出的作用。尽管慈善资本主义的重要性日益增加，但相关的学术话语仍然有限且支离破碎。我们的论文汇集了各种辩论，系统地审查和综合了有关慈善资本主义的学术文献。除了对慈善事业的铸造和实践提出问题外，我们审查中包含的 186 份相关出版物表明，慈善资本主义在教育、国际发展、医疗保健和农业领域得到了高度重视。通过这些，我们确定并讨论了三个文化框架的重要性：(1) 发展挑战被定义为科学问题；(2) 受益人被定为生产型企业家；(3) 慈善事业被定义为社会投资。概述并批判性地审查这些问题，这项工作有助于： 对关键辩论和问题的综合分析；通过对慈善资本主义的多种解释的评估性探索，增强了概念的清晰度和细微差别；以及未来的研究议程，以解决持续存在的知识差距并完善重点。通过对慈善资本主义的多种解释的评估性探索，增强了概念的清晰度和细微差别；以及未来的研究议程，以解决持续存在的知识差距并完善重点。通过对慈善资本主义的多种解释的评估性探索，增强了概念的清晰度和细微差别；以及未来的研究议程，以解决持续存在的知识差距并完善重点。