The research assessments of countries or institutions should reveal their contribution to the advancement of science. Taking into consideration the correlation that exists between scientific impact and number of citations, research assessments can be based on citation counts. However, it is crucial to perform the counts in the heavy tail of citation distributions. Following this heavy tail approach, all measurements performed in Spanish universities show that their research is inefficient because the proportion of highly cited papers is much lower than in the most scientifically advanced countries. The same conclusion is reached when considering the number of researchers in the Ioannidis, Boyack, and Baas lists of highly cited researchers.

中文翻译：

---

调查结果：西班牙被停职

对国家或机构的研究评估应揭示其对科学发展的贡献。考虑到科学影响与引文数量之间的相关性，研究评估可以基于引文计数。但是，至关重要的是在引文分布的尾部进行计数。遵循这种沉重的尾巴方法，西班牙大学进行的所有测量结果表明，他们的研究效率低下，因为被高引用论文的比例远低于最科学先进的国家。当考虑到Ioannidis，Boyack和Baas的高引用研究人员列表中的研究人员数量时，得出相同的结论。