当前位置: X-MOL 学术Diplomacy & Statecraft › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
‘Transitions in Context: Making Peace in 1814 – 1815; 1918 – 1920; 1945 – 1955ʹ
Diplomacy & Statecraft ( IF 0.3 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-04 , DOI: 10.1080/09592296.2021.1913354
Richard Langhorne 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

Frequently, peace settlements mark moments of systemic change in international politics. The object of this article is to examine how far these three major European peace settlements of the modern period – 1814–15, 1918–20 and 1945-55 – represented the contemporary political and diplomatic responses to the urgent needs that the end of a general war inevitably brings. It argues that, with the exception of the Vienna settlement, often the urgency of the situation at the end of the war was itself the consequence of underlying conditions which were so profound as to be immutable at any particular moment and immune from any short-term political interventions. Too much should never be expected of formal peace settlements.



中文翻译:

过渡时期:1814年至1815年实现和平;1918年-1920年;1945年-1955年ʹ

摘要

通常,和平解决方案标志着国际政治系统性变化的时刻。本文的目的是研究现代欧洲这三个主要的和平解决方案(1814-15年,1918-20年和1945-55年)在多大程度上代表了当代对政治和外交对普遍需求的迫切需求的回应。战争不可避免地带来。它认为,除了维也纳定居点以外,战争结束时局势的紧迫性本身往往是潜在条件的后果,这种潜在条件如此深远,以至于在任何特定时刻都是不变的,并且不受任何短期影响的影响。政治干预。正式和平解决决不能指望太多。

更新日期:2021-05-04
down
wechat
bug