It is now a decade since The International Commission on the Taxonomy of Fungi (ICTF) produced an overview of requirements and best practices for describing a new fungal species. In the meantime the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICNafp) has changed from its former name (the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature) and introduced new formal requirements for valid publication of species scientific names, including the separation of provisions specific to Fungi and organisms treated as fungi in a new Chapter F. Equally transformative have been changes in the data collection, data dissemination, and analytical tools available to mycologists. This paper provides an updated and expanded discussion of current publication requirements along with best practices for the description of new fungal species and publication of new names and for improving accessibility of their associated metadata that have developed over the last 10 years. Additionally, we provide: (1) model papers for different fungal groups and circumstances; (2) a checklist to simplify meeting (i) the requirements of the ICNafp to ensure the effective, valid and legitimate publication of names of new taxa, and (ii) minimally accepted standards for description; and, (3) templates for preparing standardized species descriptions.

中文翻译：

---

如何发布新的真菌物种或名称 3.0 版


自国际真菌分类委员会 (ICTF) 概述描述新真菌物种的要求和最佳实践以来，已有十年了。与此同时，《国际藻类、真菌和植物命名法典》(ICNafp) 已更改其原名（《国际植物命名法典》），并对物种学名的有效公布提出了新的正式要求，包括条款的分离在新的 F 章中专门针对真菌和被视为真菌的生物体。同样具有变革性的是真菌学家可用的数据收集、数据传播和分析工具的变化。本文提供了对当前出版要求的更新和扩展讨论，以及描述新真菌物种和出版新名称以及提高过去 10 年开发的相关元数据的可访问性的最佳实践。此外，我们还提供：（1）针对不同真菌类群和环境的模型论文； (2) 一份清单，用于简化满足 (i) ICNafp 的要求，以确保有效、有效和合法地公布新分类群名称，以及 (ii) 最低可接受的描述标准； (3) 用于准备标准化物种描述的模板。