Disruptions to transport networks are inevitable and detrimental to the functioning of society. Improving the resilience of transport networks to disruptive events has, therefore, a significant impact on society. Although the resilience of a transport system depends on the ability of the network to sustain the consequences of initial disruption (i.e. robustness) and quickly recover its performance (i.e. rapidity), the latter attracted less attention than robustness. The present paper focuses on quantifying the impacts of recovery processes and, more specifically, link-repair strategies on resilience. Several link-repair strategies are compared across a multitude of perturbation scenarios in the well-known Sioux Falls network. The strategies considered include: (i) the optimal (minimising the disruption consequences over the recovery process), (ii) average (representing a recovery process where the disrupted links are repaired in random order), (iii) flow-based (where the links with the highest traffic flow in the undisrupted network are repaired first), and (iv) criticality-based (where the links whose individual failure result in the highest impacts on the system performance are repaired first) recovery. The results of this comparison are subsequently used to evaluate the correlation between robustness and resilience, and characterise the optimal repair strategy.

交通网络的中断是不可避免的，对社会的运作是有害的。因此，提高交通网络对破坏性事件的恢复能力对社会产生了重大影响。尽管传输系统的弹性取决于网络承受初始中断后果（即鲁棒性）和快速恢复其性能（即快速性）的能力，但后者引起的关注少于鲁棒性。本文件侧重于量化恢复过程的影响，更具体地说，是链路修复策略对恢复力的影响。在著名的 Sioux Falls 网络中的多种扰动场景中比较了几种链路修复策略。考虑的策略包括：(i) 最优（最小化恢复过程中的中断后果），(ii) 平均（代表以随机顺序修复中断链接的恢复过程），（iii）基于流量（首先修复未中断网络中具有最高流量的链接），以及 (iv) 关键性-基于（首先修复其单个故障对系统性能影响最大的链路）恢复。该比较的结果随后用于评估稳健性和弹性之间的相关性，并表征最佳修复策略。(iv) 基于关键性（其中个别故障导致对系统性能影响最大的链路首先被修复）恢复。该比较的结果随后用于评估稳健性和弹性之间的相关性，并表征最佳修复策略。(iv) 基于关键性（其中个别故障导致对系统性能影响最大的链路首先被修复）恢复。该比较的结果随后用于评估稳健性和弹性之间的相关性，并表征最佳修复策略。