当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Oral Microbiol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Salivette, a relevant saliva sampling device for SARS-CoV-2 detection
Journal of Oral Microbiology ( IF 3.7 ) Pub Date : 2021-04-30 , DOI: 10.1080/20002297.2021.1920226
Monique Melo Costa 1, 2, 3 , Nicolas Benoit 1, 2, 3, 4 , Jerome Dormoi 1, 2, 3 , Remy Amalvict 1, 2, 3, 4 , Nicolas Gomez 1, 2, 3 , Hervé Tissot-Dupont 2, 3 , Matthieu Million 2, 3 , Bruno Pradines 1, 2, 3, 4 , Samuel Granjeaud 5 , Lionel Almeras 1, 2, 3
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

Background: The gold standard for COVID-19 diagnosis relies on quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase-chain reaction (RT-qPCR) from nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens, but NPSs present several limitations. The simplicity, low invasive and possibility of self-collection of saliva imposed these specimens as a relevant alternative for SARS-CoV-2 detection. However, the discrepancy of saliva test results compared to NPSs made of its use controversial. Here, we assessed Salivettes®, as a standardized saliva collection device, and compared SARS-CoV-2 positivity on paired NPS and saliva specimens.

Methods: A total of 303 individuals randomly selected among those investigated for SARS-CoV-2 were enrolled, including 30 (9.9%) patients previously positively tested using NPS (follow-up group), 90 (29.7%) mildly symptomatic and 183 (60.4%) asymptomatic.

Results: The RT-qPCR revealed a positive rate of 11.6% (n = 35) and 17.2% (n = 52) for NPSs and saliva samples, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of saliva samples were 82.9% and 91.4%, respectively, using NPS as reference. The highest proportion of discordant results concerned the follow-up group (33.3%). Although the agreement exceeded 90.0% in the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups, 17 individuals were detected positive only in saliva samples, with consistent medical arguments.

Conclusion Saliva collected with Salivette® was more sensitive for detecting symptomatic and pre-symptomatic infections.



中文翻译:

Salivette,一种用于SARS-CoV-2检测的相关唾液采样装置

摘要

背景: COVID-19 诊断的黄金标准依赖于鼻咽拭子 (NPS) 标本的定量逆转录酶聚合酶链反应 (RT-qPCR),但 NPS 存在一些局限性。这些样本简单、侵入性低且可以自行采集唾液,因此可以作为 SARS-CoV-2 检测的相关替代方案。然而,唾液测试结果与 NPS 的差异使其使用引起争议。在这里,我们评估了 Salivettes® 作为一种标准化唾液收集装置,并比较了配对 NPS 和唾液样本的 SARS-CoV-2 阳性率。

方法:从 SARS-CoV-2 调查对象中随机选出 303 名个体,其中 30 名(9.9%)名先前使用 NPS 检测呈阳性的患者(随访组)、90 名(29.7%)名轻度症状患者和 183 名(29.7%)名轻度症状患者60.4%)无症状。

结果: RT-qPCR 显示 NPS 和唾液样本的阳性率分别为 11.6% (n = 35) 和 17.2% (n = 52)。以 NPS 为参考,唾液样本的敏感性和特异性分别为 82.9% 和 91.4%。不一致结果的比例最高的是随访组(33.3%)。尽管有症状组和无症状组的一致性超过90.0%,但仅在唾液样本中检测出17人呈阳性,这与医学观点一致。

结论使用 Salivette® 采集的唾液对于检测有症状和症状前感染更敏感。

更新日期:2021-04-30
down
wechat
bug