当前位置: X-MOL 学术Family Court Review › 论文详情
Taking a Shot: Access to Justice, Judging and eCourt
Family Court Review Pub Date : 2021-04-29 , DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12574
R. James Williams

Access to Justice issues have shown us that our traditional adversarial dispute resolution model is slow, costly, divisive and complex ‐ for both self represented litigants and those with lawyers. Addressing these issues through the provision of information to litigants has not been enough. Family Justice reports speak of the need for “culture change” and judicial leadership in affecting change. Judges have created options to the traditional adversarial model with processes such as Settlement Conferences, Binding Settlement Conferences, Informal Trials and Case Management. COVID19 has “forced” courts to embrace Virtual and telephone proceedings. There are now choices in Court based, Judicially‐run dispute resolution processes. Nova Scotia's Supreme Court, Family Division has a process “add” ‐ an eCourt Pilot instituting an electronic, chat‐based Court process that gives litigants and Judges a new “choice” of process.

中文翻译:

开枪:诉诸司法,审判和法院

诉诸司法的问题向我们表明,我们的传统对抗性争端解决模型对于自我代表的诉讼人和有律师的诉讼人而言,都是缓慢,昂贵,分裂且复杂的。通过向诉讼人提供信息来解决这些问题还远远不够。家庭司法报告谈到需要“文化变革”和司法领导才能影响变革。法官通过诸如和解会议,有约束力的和解会议,非正式审判和案件管理等流程,为传统对抗模式创造了选择。COVID19已“强迫”法院接受虚拟和电话诉讼。现在,基于法院的,由司法机构运营的争端解决程序中可以有多种选择。新斯科舍省最高法院家庭部有一个“添加”程序-eCourt Pilot负责建立电子,
更新日期:2021-04-29
全部期刊列表>>
欢迎新作者ACS
聚焦环境污染物
专攻离子通道生理学研究
中国作者高影响力研究精选
虚拟特刊
屿渡论文,编辑服务
浙大
上海中医药大学
苏州大学
江南大学
四川大学
灵长脑研究中心
毛凌玲
南开大学陈瑶
朱如意
中科院
南开大学
隐藏1h前已浏览文章
课题组网站
新版X-MOL期刊搜索和高级搜索功能介绍
ACS材料视界
华辉
天合科研
x-mol收录
试剂库存
down
wechat
bug