当前位置: X-MOL 学术Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of stool samples and rectal swabs with and without pre-enrichment for the detection of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCREB)
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases ( IF 3.7 ) Pub Date : 2021-04-27 , DOI: 10.1007/s10096-021-04250-1
Tarek Jazmati 1, 2 , Axel Hamprecht 1, 2, 3 , Nathalie Jazmati 1, 2, 4
Affiliation  

To establish the optimal detection of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCREB), the performance of four different screening methods has been investigated: stool samples without (A) and with (B) pre-enrichment and rectal swabs without (C) and with (D) pre-enrichment were contrasted. Pre-enrichment approaches (B and D) increased the detection of 3GCREB carriers by 29.4% (20/68 3GCREB carriers only found using pre-enrichment, p < 0.0001) compared to direct plating approaches (A and C). Moreover, the study demonstrates a minor advantage of stool samples in contrast to rectal swabs in both cases (with and without pre-enrichment). Registration number: DRKS00022520, 24 July 2020.



中文翻译:

粪便样本和直肠拭子在检测第三代耐头孢菌素肠杆菌 (3GCREB) 时的比较

为了建立对第三代耐头孢菌素肠杆菌 (3GCREB) 的最佳检测,我们研究了四种不同筛查方法的性能:没有 (A) 和 (B) 预富集的粪便样本和没有 (C) 的直肠拭子和与(D)预富集进行了对比。 与直接电镀方法(A 和 C)相比,预富集方法(B 和 D)将 3GCREB ​​载体的检测率提高了 29.4%(仅使用预富集发现的 20/68 3GCREB ​​载体,p < 0.0001)。此外,该研究表明,在两种情况下(有和没有预富集),粪便样本与直肠拭子相比具有较小的优势。注册号:DRKS00022520,2020 年 7 月 24 日。

更新日期:2021-04-28
down
wechat
bug