Many European countries have introduced Open Science (OS) policies to improve the quality and efficiency of science and to increase economic and societal growth. Researchers’ perceptions and experiences of OS policies remain relatively under-investigated. This explorative study applies the policy alienation perspective to understand researchers’ perceptions of OS policy implementation. Analysis of survey responses indicates that researchers have difficulties in coping with OS policy and that they feel policy alienation from OS policy. Hence, researchers may be less willing to try to support OS policy implementation despite the fact that OS policies are motivated by the desire to enhance the excellence and quality of research. The findings address how the incentive problems lie not only in the research evaluation and academic credit systems but also in the policy–practice divide. These problems need to be solved in terms of participation in policymaking and in the knowledge production of ‘openness’ itself.

中文翻译：

---

政策异化的威胁：在研究实践中探索开放科学政策的实施

许多欧洲国家已经引入开放科学（OS）政策，以提高科学的质量和效率并促进经济和社会增长。研究人员对操作系统策略的看法和经验仍处于研究不足的状态。这项探索性研究运用政策异化的观点来理解研究人员对OS政策实施的看法。对调查答复的分析表明，研究人员在应对操作系统策略方面存在困难，并且他们认为策略与操作系统策略有所不同。因此，尽管操作系统策略是由提高研究卓越性和质量的愿望所驱动的，但研究人员可能不太愿意尝试支持操作系统策略的实施。研究结果解决了激励问题不仅存在于研究评估和学术学分体系中，而且还存在于政策与实践的鸿沟中。这些问题需要通过参与决策和“开放”本身的知识生产来解决。