Abstract

Translational science has specific stages outlined by the National Institute of Health. Systemic family therapy (SFT) researchers do not seem to explicitly embrace this paradigm, though many are actively adding to the discipline’s empirically supported intervention base. We discuss the role of translational science in the landscape of SFT research. We report the findings of a case study review of a year’s worth of SFT scholarship. We make recommendations on how researchers can use this paradigm to help practitioners better understand the limits of applying research findings in their clinical practice, and provide recommendations for how to write clinical implications sections.

摘要

转化科学具有美国国立卫生研究院概述的特定阶段。系统性家庭治疗 (SFT) 研究人员似乎并没有明确接受这种范式，尽管许多人正在积极增加该学科的经验支持干预基础。我们讨论了转化科学在 SFT 研究领域中的作用。我们报告了对一年 SFT 奖学金的案例研究审查的结果。我们就研究人员如何使用这种范式来帮助从业者更好地理解在临床实践中应用研究结果的局限性提出建议，并就如何编写临床意义部分提供建议。