The primary goal of this meta-analysis was to estimate the overall size of the relation between rapid automatized naming (RAN) and spelling in alphabetic languages and to examine what factors may moderate their relation. In addition, we examined if the size of the RAN-spelling relation is similar to that of the RAN-reading relation. A random-effects model with robust variance estimation was used to analyze 264 RAN-spelling effect sizes and 385 RAN-reading effect sizes from 103 studies. Results indicated a moderate association between RAN and spelling (\(r=.35\)) and between RAN and reading (\(r=\) .44) with a moderately high degree of heterogeneity. In addition, moderator analyses revealed both similarities and differences in the moderators of the RAN-spelling and RAN-reading relation. Whereas RAN letters and digits correlated more strongly with spelling and reading than colors and objects, RAN correlated more strongly with spelling of real words than pseudowords and more strongly with spelling in opaque orthographies than in intermediate or transparent orthographies. Our findings suggest that RAN is related to both reading and spelling partly because it contributes to the formation of print-to-sound or sound-to-print connections.

这项荟萃分析的主要目的是估计快速自动命名（RAN）与字母语言中的拼写之间的关系的整体大小，并研究哪些因素可以缓和它们之间的关系。此外，我们检查了RAN拼写关系的大小是否与RAN读关系的大小相似。具有鲁棒方差估计的随机效应模型用于分析来自103项研究的264种RAN拼写效应大小和385种RAN读效应大小。结果表明RAN与拼写（\（r = .35 \））和RAN与阅读之间（\（r = \）.44）具有中等程度的异质性。此外，主持人分析还显示了RAN拼写和RAN阅读关系主持人的异同。与颜色和对象相比，RAN字母和数字与拼写和阅读之间的关联更紧密，而与伪单词相比，RAN与真实单词的拼写之间的关联更强，而在不透明拼字法中，RAN的字母和数字与拼写之间的关联则更强。我们的发现表明RAN与阅读和拼写相关，部分原因是它有助于形成打印到声音或声音到打印的连接。