The objective of our study is to explore scientific creativity with a focus on intellectual (thinking) skills in the cognitive aspect by analyzing scientific theories, which are basically the creativity of historical great scientists, Galileo, Newton, Einstein While our study laid stress on the cognitive domain, exploration of the creativity of great scientists is also connected with affective characteristics (motives, task commitment, etc.) and their environmental factors (incubation period). Great scientists of the science history were aware of the discrepancy issue among different fields of study and long searched for solutions, which they held in their minds. As a result, they created a certain hypothesis using the abstraction strategy in which they leave only the considerations suitable for the world view of the time. Then, they conducted a thought experiment that justified it. The reason why it was difficult for general people to understand was that there was a domain transition beyond materials obtained in the abstraction process. Furthermore, they all had strong motives for the future as well as task commitment. Knowledge is a product of natural selection, and the fusion of knowledge that does not presuppose the unity of knowledge is meaningless.

我们研究的目的是通过分析科学理论来探索科学创造力，重点是认知方面的智力（思维）技能，这些理论基本上是历史上伟大的科学家伽利略，牛顿，爱因斯坦的创造力，而我们的研究则将重点放在在认知领域，对伟大科学家创造力的探索还与情感特征（动机，任务承担等）及其环境因素（潜伏期）相关。科学史上的伟大科学家意识到了不同研究领域之间的差异性问题，并在他们心中长期寻找解决方案。结果，他们使用抽象策略创建了某种假设，在这种假设中，他们只考虑了适合当时世界观的考虑因素。然后，他们进行了一次思想实验，证明了这一点。普通人难以理解的原因是，除了抽象过程中获得的材料之外，还存在域转换。此外，他们对未来以及任务承担都有强烈的动机。知识是自然选择的产物，不以知识统一为前提的知识融合是没有意义的。