Foreign policy has become one of the most polarizing issues in American politics. This paper investigates the extent to which this division extends to arguably one of the most bipartisan foreign policy issues: policies toward rogue states. Our examination of congressional voting and sponsorship data related to rogue states since 1991 finds that, while there is a high degree of bipartisanship on the issue, there are nuanced but significant partisan differences. First, we find that Democrats are significantly more likely to support a rogue state bill dealing with human rights concerns, whereas Republicans are significantly less likely to support a conciliatory bill. We also find that members of Congress are less likely to propose and support a rogue state bill in the presence of a co-partisan president. We thus conclude that, despite the overall high degree of bipartisanship on rogue state issues, partisanship plays an important role in influencing legislative behavior.

中文翻译：

---

美国国会和流氓国家

外交政策已成为美国政治中最两极分化的问题之一。本文调查了这种分歧在多大程度上延伸到了可以说是两党最广泛的外交政策问题之一：针对流氓国家的政策。我们对自 1991 年以来与流氓国家相关的国会投票和赞助数据的研究发现，虽然在这个问题上存在高度的两党合作，但存在细微但显着的党派差异。首先，我们发现民主党人支持处理人权问题的流氓州法案的可能性要大得多，而共和党人支持和解法案的可能性要小得多。我们还发现，国会议员不太可能在同党总统在场的情况下提出和支持一项流氓州法案。因此，我们得出结论，