This article provides an analysis of urban platform governance by mapping out the major forms of public governance and depicting the role of platforms in this field. By fusing theoretical analyses and empirical views from three urban platforms set up by the largest cities in Finland, we assess the relevance of platforms as an emerging form of local public governance. It is plausible to view platforms as hybrids that incorporate features of both networks and markets, and, to some extent, even hierarchies. However, platforms also have some irreducible features, which makes it possible to perceive them as a fourth mode of governance. Platform logic broadens the view of network governance to a broader set of connections, the orchestration of multiple logics and ecosystem thinking.

Points for practitioners

Today, city governments create and maintain urban platforms to bring together different actors and enable value-added collaboration in service provision, governance and planning. This article helps local policymakers and managers understand platform logic in involving various audiences in the creation of public value. When governing platforms, local public managers may use many of the same methods as with networks. Platform governance, however, extends the view to a broader set of connections, the orchestration of multiple logics and ecosystem thinking.

中文翻译：

---

城市平台作为一种治理模式

本文通过绘制公共治理的主要形式并描述了平台在该领域的作用，对城市平台治理进行了分析。通过融合来自芬兰最大城市建立的三个城市平台的理论分析和经验观点，我们评估了平台作为地方公共治理的新兴形式的相关性。将平台视为结合了网络和市场以及某种程度上甚至是层次结构特征的混合体是合理的。但是，平台还具有一些不可简化的功能，这使人们有可能将其视为第四种治理模式。平台逻辑将网络治理的观点扩展到更广泛的连接集，多种逻辑的编排和生态系统思维。

从业人员要点

如今，市政府创建并维护城市平台，以汇集不同的参与者，并在服务提供，治理和规划中实现增值协作。本文可帮助当地政策制定者和管理者了解平台逻辑，以使各种受众参与创造公共价值。在管理平台时，本地公共经理可能会使用许多与网络相同的方法。但是，平台治理将视野扩展到更广泛的连接集，多种逻辑的编排和生态系统思维。