Abstract

In this article, I comment on the potential benefits and limitations of open science reforms for improving the transparency and accountability of research, and enhancing the credibility of research findings within communities of policy and practice. Specifically, I discuss the role of replication and reproducibility of research in promoting better quality studies, the identification of generalizable principles, and relevance for practitioners and policymakers. Second, I suggest that greater attention to theory might contribute to the impact of open science practices, and discuss ways in which theory has implications for sampling, measurement, and research design. Ambiguities concerning the aims of preregistration and registered reports also are highlighted. In conclusion, I discuss structural roadblocks to open science reform and reflect on the relevance of these reforms for educational psychology.

摘要

在本文中，我评论了开放科学改革对提高研究的透明度和问责制以及增强政策和实践社区中研究结果的可信度的潜在好处和局限性。具体来说，我讨论了研究的重复性和可重复性在促进更高质量的研究，确定通用原则以及与从业者和决策者的相关性方面的作用。其次，我建议对理论的更多关注可能会影响开放科学实践的影响，并讨论理论对采样，测量和研究设计产生影响的方式。还强调了有关预注册和注册报告目的的歧义。综上所述，