Arbitration as a dispute settlement mechanism is gaining popularity due to various factors such as its consensual nature and flexibility as compared to court proceedings. Independency of arbitration as an adjudication mechanism has enhanced and distanced it from the involvement of national courts. However, there may be times when parties may seek intervention of courts to secure interim or conservatory measures till final award in rendered. This article discusses whether an emergency arbitrator is a proper arbitrator who renders enforceable decisions and whether the provisional measures so granted should be construed as final award or not.

中文翻译：

---

国际仲裁中准予临时措施的司法干预

仲裁作为一种争端解决机制，由于其与法院诉讼程序相比的双方同意的性质和灵活性等多种因素而越来越受欢迎。仲裁作为裁决机制的独立性增强了它并使其远离了国家法院的参与。但是，有时当事方可能会寻求法院的干预，以确保在作出最终裁决之前采取临时或保全措施。本文讨论紧急仲裁员是否是作出可执行决定的适当仲裁员，以及如此授予的临时措施是否应被解释为最终裁决。