Abstract

Traditionally, the genealogy of Edo Confucianism, that is, Confucianism reinterpreted and reconstructed in the Tokugawa period, has been classified into the Chu-Hsi, Wang Yang-ming, Ancient, and Eclectic schools. These classifications are based on the most representative Confucian theories in the Tokugawa period and are useful for understanding their genealogy. However, when we try to capture the substance of Confucian thought from the interest of “education,” it is very difficult to understand the differences of each school’s educational thought based on this classification. For example, according to the above classification of Confucian theories, the Jinsai and Sorai schools are also included in the Ancient school. However, it is no exaggeration to say that both educational ideas are completely different. In this study, although both Jinsai and Sorai are classified as Ancient schools, I will clarify how their educational theories are structured and how their contents are different. This study examines the content of Confucian thought from the perspective of “education.” I hope that the discussion will open up the possibility of a more precise understanding of the “educational thought” of Edo Confucianism.

摘要

传统上，江户儒学的谱系，即德川时代重新解释和重构的儒学，分为朱熹、王阳明、古派和折衷派。这些分类是基于德川时代最具代表性的儒家理论，有助于理解他们的家谱。然而，当我们试图从“教育”的利益出发去捕捉儒家思想的实质时，很难基于这种分类来理解各个流派教育思想的差异。例如，按照儒家理论的上述分类，金赛和索莱学派也属于古学派。但是，毫不夸张地说，两种教育理念完全不同。在这项研究中，尽管金斋和空莱都被归类为古代学校，但我将澄清他们的教育理论是如何构建的，以及它们的内容有何不同。本研究从“教育”的角度审视儒家思想的内容。我希望这次讨论能够为更准确地理解江户儒学的“教育思想”开辟可能。