Rule 44 of the icc Rules of Procedure and Evidence stipulates that non-state parties to the Rome Statute may accept the jurisdiction of the Court with respect to the crimes referred to in Article 5 of relevance to the situation by lodging a declaration under Article 12(3) of the Statute. The ending phrase of this provision gives rise to the speculation that a non-member state has a power to accept the Court’s jurisdiction in a partial way, namely over a specific situation. To examine this feasibility, the present article will: (i) explain the functions of the Article 12(3) mechanism; (ii) discuss the possibility of making a situational acceptance; and (iii) contemplate the meaning of the concept of situation. This article suggests that a non-state party can exclusively accept the Court’s jurisdiction over a specific situation, and that is a concrete crisis within a territory. Keywords contextual element – crisis – ad hoc jurisdiction – acceptance – delegation

国际刑事法院规则 44《程序和证据规则》规定，《罗马规约》的非缔约国可以通过根据《规约》第 12 条第 3 款提出声明，接受法院对第 5 条所述与情况有关的罪行的管辖权. 该条款的结尾短语引发了一种猜测，即非成员国有权以部分方式接受法院的管辖权，即在特定情况下。为了检验这种可行性，本文将： (i) 解释第 12(3) 条机制的功能；(ii) 讨论作出情境接受的可能性；(iii) 思考情境概念的含义。本条建议非国家当事方可以排他地接受法院对特定情况的管辖权，这是一个领土内的具体危机。关键词语境元素 – 危机 –临时管辖权 – 接受 – 委托