This corrigendum concerns the following manuscript: Phillips, JS. (2020) Time‐varying responses of lake metabolism to light and temperature. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(3), 652–666 doi.org/10.1002/lno.11333.

The analysis reported in Phillips (2020) is based on a model of lake ecosystem metabolism, as inferred from water column dissolved oxygen data. The model accounts for exchange of oxygen with the atmosphere. This makes use of a standard equation for the temperature‐dependence of the Schmidt number, reported in table A1 of Wannikoff (1992). The results reported in the article are based on an erroneous reproduction of this equation. Specifically, the equation was specified as follows:

where T is temperature in °C. However, the sign of the second term should be negative, rather than positive. So, the correct version is

After refitting the model using the updated equation for the Schmidt number, the results were largely the unchanged. The magnitude of ecosystem respiration is shifted downward slightly in the revised versions of Figs. 2 and 3, but otherwise the results are nearly identical. The robustness of the method to such errors is not unexpected. The original article included a comparison of two different models of oxygen exchange with the atmosphere, which had a minimal effect on the results. This is due to the (1) inclusion of process error and (2) the model's treatment of biological processes as temporally autocorrelated. Deviations due to the erroneous temperature dependence of the Schmidt number were therefore not attributed to the biological processes of primary interest. The Github repository associated with the article (https://github.com/jsphillips2/sonde_oxygen) has been updated accordingly, while also preserving the code for the original analysis.

本勘误涉及以下手稿：Phillips，JS。（2020）湖泊新陈代谢对光和温度的时变响应。湖泊科学与海洋学，65（3），652–666 doi.org/10.1002/lno.11333。

Phillips（2020）中报告的分析基于湖泊生态系统新陈代谢的模型，该模型是根据水柱溶解氧数据推断得出的。该模型说明了氧气与大气的交换。Wannikoff（1992）的表A1报道了施密特数与温度的关系的标准方程式。文章中报道的结果基于该方程的错误再现。具体来说，该方程式指定如下：

其中T是以°C为单位的温度。但是，第二项的符号应为负，而不是正。因此，正确的版本是

使用更新后的Schmidt方程式对模型进行拟合后，结果基本上没有变化。在图1和2的修订版中，生态系统呼吸的幅度略有向下移动。2和3，但结果几乎相同。该方法对此类错误的鲁棒性并不意外。原始文章包括两种与大气中氧气交换的不同模型的比较，这对结果影响很小。这是由于（1）包含过程误差，以及（2）模型将生物过程视为时间自相关的。因此，由于施密特数的温度依赖性错误而引起的偏差不归因于主要关注的生物学过程。与文章关联的Github存储库（https：// github。