Theories of stereotyping and prejudice have yet to be comprehensively applied to accents. U.S. adults (n = 124) listened to clips from Indian, Latinx, Arabic, and Toronto-accented speakers. They then completed stereotype measures based on solidarity, status, dynamism (SSD), and the Stereotype Content Model (SCM), and evaluated the speakers. Stereotypes, but not evaluations, differed between accents. Results suggest that measures of warmth and competence may be sufficient to capture differences in accent-based stereotyping. Authoritarianism predicted accent-based prejudice against non-North American accents relative to Toronto accents (as in-group allies), whereas social dominance orientation predicted more negative evaluations overall. Neither ideological belief predicted stereotypes.

刻板印象和偏见的理论尚未全面应用于口音。美国成年人（n  = 124）听了来自印度，拉丁文，阿拉伯文和多伦多口音的演讲者的片段。然后，他们基于团结，状态，活力（SSD）和刻板印象内容模型（SCM）完成了刻板印象测量，并对演讲者进行了评估。刻板印象之间的刻板印象不同，但没有评估。结果表明，对温暖和能力的测量可能足以捕捉基于口音的陈规定型观念中的差异。相对于多伦多的口音（作为集团内的盟友），威权主义预言了针对非北美口音的基于口音的偏见，而总体上社会主导地位则预示着更多的负面评价。两种意识形态的信念都没有预见到刻板印象。