This article reviews the emerging literature on the negotiation of home-related feelings, claims, and practices in the public urban sphere, under the rubric of homemaking in the public. This contributes to a better sociological understanding of home and illuminates long-debated societal questions such as the interaction between majority and minority groups and the shifting boundaries between what is (regarded as) public or private. While home has traditionally been understood as a private and domestic matter, it also has a major public significance. As a category of analysis, it reveals how supposedly domestic attitudes, routines, and practices are scaled up into the public domain. As a category of practice, it is a powerful discursive resource for contentious politics in the extra-domestic domain. Who is entitled and legitimated to claim a public space as “home”, and what this implies for inter-group categorizations and relations, are questions that deserve original and comparative analysis in sociology. Processes of domestication of the public sphere, of mutual interaction between public and private life realms, and of claims-making on various scales can be fruitfully revisited along these lines, by advancing an original research agenda on the ways of framing, feeling and claiming public space as home.

中文翻译：

---

在公共场所做家务。在框架、感觉和声称超家庭空间作为“家”的尺度和风险上

本文回顾了关于公共城市领域中与家庭相关的感受、主张和实践的谈判的新兴文献，在公共家政的标题下。这有助于更好地了解家庭的社会学，并阐明长期争论不休的社会问题，例如多数群体和少数群体之间的互动以及（被视为）公共或私人之间的界限不断变化。虽然家庭传统上被理解为私人和家庭事务，但它也具有重大的公共意义。作为一种分析，它揭示了所谓的国内态度、惯例和做法是如何被扩大到公共领域的。作为实践的一个类别，它是一个强大的话语资源，用于处理国内以外领域的有争议的政治。谁有权并合法地将公共空间称为“家”，这对群体间的分类和关系意味着什么，这些问题值得社会学进行原创和比较分析。公共领域的驯化过程，公共和私人生活领域之间的相互互动，以及在各种尺度上提出主张的过程，可以沿着这些路线进行富有成效的重新审视，通过推进关于构建、感受和主张公共的方式的原创研究议程。空间如家。