In this paper, I argue that the Alt-Right needs to be taken seriously by the liberal establishment, the general public, and leftist cultural elites for five main reasons: 1) its ‘right-wing Gramscianism’ borrows from the French New Right (Nouvelle Droite – ND) and the French and pan-European Identitarian movement. This means that it is engaged in the continuation of a larger Euro-American metapolitical struggle to change hearts and minds on issues related to white nationalism, anti-Semitism, and racialism; 2) it is indebted to the metapolitical evolution of sectors of the violent neo-Nazi and earlier white nationalist movements in the USA; 3) this metapolitical orientation uses the mass media, the internet, and social media in general to reach and influence the masses of Americans; 4) the ‘cultural war’ means that the Alt-Right’s spokesman Richard Spencer, French ND leader Alain de Benoist, and other intellectuals see themselves as a type of Leninist vanguard on the radical right, which borrows from left-wing authors such as Antonio Gramsci and their positions in order to win the metapolitical struggle against ‘dominant’ liberal and left-wing political and cultural elites; and 5) this ‘cultural war’ is intellectually and philosophically sophisticated because it understands the crucial role of culture in destabilizing liberal society and makes use of important philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche, Carl Schmitt, Julius Evola and others in order to give credence to its revolutionary, racialist, and anti-liberal ideals.

在本文中，我认为自由派机构，公众和左派文化精英必须认真对待替代权，原因有五个：1）它的“右翼葛兰西主义”是从法国新右派那里借来的（新贵Droite – ND）以及法国和泛欧同盟运动。这意味着它致力于继续进行更大范围的欧美元政治斗争，以改变与白人民族主义，反犹太主义和种族主义有关的问题的思想；2）这归功于暴力的新纳粹分子和美国较早的白人民族主义运动的各个部门的元政治演变；3）这种元政治取向通常使用大众媒体，互联网和社交媒体来影响美国人的群体并产生影响。4）“文化大战”是指Alt-Right的发言人Richard Spencer，法国新民主党领导人Alain de Benoist和其他知识分子将自己视为激进右翼的列宁主义先锋队，该组织借鉴了安东尼奥·葛兰西（Antonio Gramsci）等左翼作家及其立场，以赢得与“主要”自由派和左翼政治和文化精英的元政治斗争；5）这场“文化战争”在思想上和哲学上都是复杂的，因为它了解文化在破坏自由社会稳定中的关键作用，并利用了弗里德里希·尼采，卡尔·施密特，朱利叶斯·埃沃拉等重要哲学家，以对其文化给予信任。革命，种族主义和反自由主义的理想。