ABSTRACT

The central themes of this study are how housing tenure affects moving away from neighbourhoods with differing degrees of immigrant concentration in Stockholm and, comparing two cohorts, how the relationship between housing tenure, ethnic background and residential mobility develops over time. The findings reveal that the effect of housing tenure on moving varies marginally between neighbourhood types, and differences between housing tenures are reduced over time. Residential mobility is increasingly associated with higher income levels and members of the non-western, foreign-born group are less likely to move when the housing market is increasingly owner dominated. These ethnic hierarchies also apply to residential sorting. The sorting of out-movers from neighbourhoods with high concentrations of immigrants is increasingly affected by income. However, the non-western, foreign-born group is also increasingly dependent on housing assets in order to leave immigrant-dense neighbourhoods, which is not the case for other groups. The results show a shift in the necessary resources for residential mobility trajectories for those at the bottom end of the ethnic hierarchy and indicate that the place-stratification framework needs to differentiate between different types of assets and population groups to enable a better understanding of residential sorting in a changing housing market.

摘要

这项研究的中心主题是住房使用权如何影响远离斯德哥尔摩具有不同程度移民集中度的社区的搬迁，以及比较两个队列，住房使用权，种族背景和居住流动性之间的关系如何随着时间发展。研究结果表明，住房使用权对搬迁的影响在邻里类型之间略有不同，并且住房使用权之间的差异会随着时间的推移而减小。住房流动性越来越与更高的收入水平相关联，并且当住房市场越来越由业主主导时，非西方，外国出生的群体的成员迁移的可能性较小。这些种族等级制度也适用于住宅分类。收入日益影响来自移民高度集中的社区的外来人员的分类。但是，非西方，外国出生的群体也越来越依赖住房资产才能离开移民密集地区，而其他群体则并非如此。结果表明，对于位于种族等级制度最底层的居民而言，用于居住流动轨迹的必要资源已经发生了变化，并且表明，地点分层框架需要区分不同类型的资产和人口群体，以更好地理解居住分类在不断变化的房地产市场中。