ABSTRACT

The author once again offers a definition of paradox that fundamentally differs from a Hegelian notion of contradiction. In a paradox, thought should logically identify and comprehend the mental reproduction of the subject of thought and the object of thought as the nonidentical thought of an unthinkable being. This is why Bibler argues for the emergence of a new logic as the logic of the beginnings of logic, a dialogue of logics whose appearance is due to changing social conditions and a transformation happened in human activity itself. From joint labor, activity becomes universal labor directed at the subject, at which point thinking turns on itself and paradoxes emerge.

摘要

作者再次提供了悖论的定义，该定义与黑格尔的矛盾概念有根本的区别。在一个悖论中，思想应在逻辑上将思想主体和思想客体的心理再造识别并理解为不可想象的存在的异质思想。这就是为什么圣经学家主张出现一种新的逻辑，作为一种逻辑起点的一种逻辑，一种逻辑的对话，这种逻辑的出现是由于社会条件的变化和人类活动本身发生的转变而引起的。从联合劳动中，活动变成针对该主题的普遍劳动，在这一点上，思维开始反省，并且出现了悖论。