Abstract

One of the most used instruments to assess perfectionism is Hewitt and Flett's Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (HFMPS). This article reports result of two studies aimed at evaluating and comparing two short HFMPS versions provided by literature in Italian samples. In Study 1, two previously proposed short forms–Cox and colleagues' and Hewitt and colleagues'–were compared in terms of factor structure and concurrent validity in a community sample of 324 participants. In Study 2, validity and reliability of the two short scales in 102 university students and 58 patients with a primary diagnosis of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder were examined. Results revealed mixed findings concerning which of the two short form should be preferred.

摘要

评估完美主义最常用的工具之一是 Hewitt 和 Flett 的多维完美主义量表 (HFMPS)。本文报告了两项研究的结果，旨在评估和比较意大利样本中文献提供的两个短 HFMPS 版本。在研究 1 中，在 324 名参与者的社区样本中比较了两个先前提出的简短表格——Cox 及其同事的和 Hewitt 及其同事的——在因子结构和同时有效性方面。在研究 2 中，对 102 名大学生和 58 名初步诊断为强迫症的患者的两个短量表的有效性和可靠性进行了检查。结果显示，关于应首选两种简短形式中的哪一种的结果不同。