Guided by the acculturation framework (Berry, 1980, 2011) and communication accommodation theory (CAT; Giles, 1970, 2016), this study examines the effects of an immigrant target’s acculturation strategy on U.S. Americans’ accommodation satisfaction and willingness to communicate with the target and the potential interaction effect between the immigrant’s acculturation strategy and the participant’s assimilation attitudes. Supporting the hypotheses, results indicated participants with lower assimilation attitudes were most satisfied with the integrated target’s accommodation behaviors, followed by the assimilated and separated targets. In addition, participants with higher assimilation attitudes were equally satisfied by the integrated and assimilated targets’ accommodation, followed by the separated target. Across all levels of assimilation attitudes (i.e., low, moderate, and high), participants were more willing to communicate with the integrated or assimilated (no significant difference) target than with the separated target. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed regarding acculturation and inter-ethnolinguistic group relations.

在适应框架（Berry，1980，2011）和交流适应理论（CAT； Giles，1970，2016）的指导下，本研究考察了移民目标的适应策略对美国美国人的适应满意度和与目标交流的意愿的影响。以及移民的适应策略和参与者的同化态度之间的潜在相互作用。支持该假设的结果表明，同化态度较低的参与者对综合目标的适应行为最满意，其次是同化和分离目标。此外，具有更高同化态度的参与者同样对综合和同化目标的住宿条件感到满意，其次是分开的目标。在所有同化态度水平（即低，中和高）上，与分离目标相比，参与者更愿意与综合或同化目标（无显着差异）进行沟通。讨论了关于适应和民族语言间群体关系的理论和实践意义。