Abstract

Objective: Describe a model for incorporating campus-based Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) services. Describe differences in patient satisfaction and utilization of follow-up resources between patients seeking SANE services at a university health center (UHC) compared to an emergency department (ED). Participants: Patients seeking SANE services at the UHC or ED of a large Midwestern university from January 2016-April 2018. Fifty-eight participants completed a satisfaction survey, including 28 students. Twenty-eight participants completed a follow-up survey, including 15 students. Methods: A Qualtrics survey assessed: 1) satisfaction following the SANE exam and 2) use of follow-up services 4–6 weeks later. Descriptive analyses, exact logistic regressions, and OLS regressions were calculated. Results: There were no differences in satisfaction, services received, or follow-up services accessed between patients at the UHC and ED, including between students. Conclusions: Campus-based SANE services meet the expectations of survivors and do not differ significantly from services at the ED.

摘要

目标：描述一个结合基于校园的性侵犯护士检查员 (SANE) 服务的模型。描述在大学健康中心 (UHC) 与急诊室 (ED) 寻求 SANE 服务的患者在患者满意度和后续资源利用方面的差异。参与者： 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 4 月在中西部一所大型大学的 UHC 或 ED 寻求 SANE 服务的患者。58 名参与者完成了满意度调查，其中包括 28 名学生。二十八名参与者完成了后续调查，其中包括 15 名学生。方法：Qualtrics 调查评估了：1) SANE 考试后的满意度和 2) 4-6 周后使用后续服务。计算了描述性分析、精确逻辑回归和 OLS 回归。结果： UHC 和 ED 的患者（包括学生）在满意度、接受的服务或获得的后续服务方面没有差异。结论：基于校园的 SANE 服务满足幸存者的期望，并且与 ED 的服务没有显着差异。