ABSTRACT

Τhis paper studies online narrative texts, which, despite their declared antiracist stance, reproduce racist positionings against migrants. Based on the broader framework of Critical Discourse Analysis, our main research question concerns the ways racist and antiracist positionings coexist. To this end, we employ an enriched version of Bamberg’s tripartite model which distinguishes the micro-levels of narrative world and narrative interaction, from which the positionings towards the discourses of the macro-level, in the present case the national discourse, emerge. A common feature of the media narratives under study is the ambiguity between an antiracist reading and a motile racist one. In these readings the denοuncement of majority instances of illiberal/frozen racism coexist with the representation of migrants as people largely assimilated to the majority context. Due to this coexistence, such texts become vehicles of liquid racism.

摘要

他的论文研究了在线叙事文本，尽管他们宣称了反对种族主义的立场，但它们再现了针对移民的种族主义立场。基于批判性话语分析的更广泛框架，我们的主要研究问题涉及种族主义和反种族主义立场共存的方式。为此，我们采用了班贝格三方模型的丰富版本，该模型区分了叙事世界和叙事互动的微观层次，从中出现了对宏观层次话语（在本例中为国家话语）的定位。所研究的媒体叙事的一个共同特征是，反种族主义读物和运动性种族主义读物之间存在歧义。在这些读物中，对大多数非自由/冻结种族主义的谴责与移民在很大程度上被大多数人同化的人们的代表并存。由于这种共存，这些文本成为液体种族主义的工具。