The purpose of this article is to review behavior-analytic publications to understand the field’s history of including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and/or queer (LGBTQ+) individuals in research publications. Twelve articles met the inclusionary criteria for review. The results of the review suggested that the representation of LGBTQ+ individuals is lacking in behavior-analytic literature. Of the 12 articles identified, two were categorized as experimental, three as commentaries, three as survey research, two as conceptual, and two as calls to action. The most prominent period for related publications was between 1973 and 1977, with long periods between other articles that were published in 1990, 1996, 2018, and 2019. Experiments published in the 1970s were associated with conversion therapy, to attempt to change an individual’s sexual or gender identity. However, other behavior analysts in the 1970s opposed these experiments. Since these early experiments, there have been no other interventions targeted at affecting the lives of gender and sexual minorities. Behavior analysts must address issues of significance faced by LGBTQ+ individuals through increasing affirming practices, reducing health disparities, increasing safety in schools, and more.

本文的目的是回顾行为分析出版物，以了解该领域在研究出版物中包括女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和/或酷儿 (LGBTQ+) 个人的历史。十二篇文章符合审查的纳入标准。审查结果表明，行为分析文献中缺乏 LGBTQ+ 个体的代表性。在确定的 12 篇文章中，2 篇被归类为实验性文章，3 篇为评论文章，3 篇为调查研究，2 篇为概念性文章，2 篇为行动呼吁。相关出版物最突出的时期是 1973 年至 1977 年，其他文章发表于 1990 年、1996 年、2018 年和 2019 年之间的时间很长。1970 年代发表的实验与转化疗法有关，试图改变个人的性或性别认同。然而，1970 年代的其他行为分析师反对这些实验。自这些早期实验以来，没有其他干预措施旨在影响性别和性少数群体的生活。行为分析师必须通过增加肯定实践、减少健康差异、增加学校安全等来解决 LGBTQ+ 个人面临的重要问题。