ABSTRACT

This paper responds to Patricia Clough’s discussion of my “Kittens in the Clinical Space, Expanding Subjectivity through Dense Temporalities of Interspecies, Transcorporeal Becoming,” in this issue. Following Clough’s nimble intellectual play of theory and method, I revisit the ontological theory forwarded in my paper, but here it is buttressed more directly with critical race and Indigenous works. The technoecologies undergirding the shifting decisions of who gets to be considered “human” are discussed. Taking my approach of engaging within the tensegrities of dense temporalities, I move further into this as a method, a prefigurative endeavor where practices are simultaneously re-presenting established forms, ideally figuring them as fluid, changing processes responsive to the agencies of (re)colonizing and decolonizing, the human-more-than-human assemblage.

摘要

本文回应了帕特里夏·克拉夫（Patricia Clough）在本期中对“我在临床空间中的小猫，通过种间密集的暂时性扩展主观性，通过体外形成”的讨论。继克拉夫（Clough）灵活的理论和方法知识分子后，我回顾了论文中提出的本体论，但在这里它与批判种族和土著著作相比更为直接。讨论了决定谁被认为是“人类”的变化决策的技术生态学。采取参与密集的时间紧张状态的方法，我将其作为一种比喻性的方法进一步进行研究，在这种方法中，实践同时重新表示既定形式，理想地将其形容为可变的，并根据（re）的机构改变过程。殖民化和非殖民化