The relation between fisheries subsidies and their effects on the level of resource extraction is widely discussed in extant literature. However, in addition to impacts on the level of fishing, the various types of subsidies can generate different incentives for greenhouse gas emissions, a subject that is still little explored. Thus, this article aims to evaluate the influence of fishing subsidies on the sector's CO₂ emissions. It is worth noting that three groups of subsidies were evaluated, the beneficial (Good), the capacity-enhancing (Bad) and the ambiguous (Amb), classified by Sumaila et al. (2010), who proposed such a division based on the negative effects on sustainability of fish stocks. To this end, an annual data panel was constructed for 14 developed countries from 2005 to 2012. The Dynamic Panel method was adopted as empirical strategy as well as the estimator proposed by Everaert and Pozzi (2007) to correct possible biases associated with micronumerosity in dynamic models. The results indicate that Bad subsidies generally point to increased CO₂ emissions. Amb subsidies, which are not clearly defined in the literature, have no significant relationship with emissions. Finally, Good subsidies are also inversely related to CO₂ emissions from the fishing industry.

现有文献广泛讨论了渔业补贴及其对资源开采水平的影响之间的关系。但是，除了对捕鱼水平的影响外，各种补贴还可以产生不同的温室气体排放诱因，这一问题至今仍未得到探讨。因此，本文旨在评估捕捞补贴对该部门CO ₂排放的影响。值得注意的是，对三类补贴进行了评估，即有益（Good），能力增强（Bad）和模棱两可（Amb）。），由Sumaila等人分类。（2010年），他基于对鱼类种群可持续性的负面影响提出了这样的划分。为此，从2005年到2012年，为14个发达国家建立了年度数据面板。采用动态面板方法作为经验策略，并采用Everaert和Pozzi（2007）提出的估计量，以纠正与动态中的微观数字有关的可能偏差。楷模。结果表明，不良补贴通常指向增加的CO ₂排放量。在文献中没有明确定义安姆补贴与排放量没有显着关系。最后，良好的补贴也与CO ₂成反比。 捕捞业的排放量。