当前位置: X-MOL 学术The British Journal of Criminology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Consequences of Judging in Transitional Justice Courts
The British Journal of Criminology ( IF 2.4 ) Pub Date : 2021-04-05 , DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azab008
Hollie Nyseth Brehm 1 , Laura C Frizzell 1 , Christopher Uggen 2 , Evelyn Gertz 3
Affiliation  

Research has found that participation in transitional justice (TJ) is associated with increased social capital and decreased well-being. This article extends this scholarship by examining how TJ mechanisms affect the social capital and well-being of the people who implement them via interviews with 135 Rwandan gacaca court judges. In terms of well-being, judges discuss pride and confidence yet also highlight stress and trauma. In terms of social capital, many judges are now mediators and local leaders, though numerous judges have also experienced grudges from the families of those they sentenced. These negative consequences were particularly prominent among judges with more authority.

中文翻译:

过渡时期司法法院的审判结果

研究发现,参与过渡司法(TJ)与增加社会资本和减少幸福感相关。本文通过与135名卢旺达加卡卡法庭法官的访谈,探讨了TJ机制如何影响实施者的社会资本和福祉,从而扩展了该奖学金的范围。在幸福感方面,法官讨论了自豪感和自信心,同时也强调了压力和创伤。在社会资本方面,许多法官现在是调解人和地方领导人,尽管许多法官也经历过被判刑者家属的怨恨。这些负面后果在具有更大权威的法官中尤为突出。
更新日期:2021-04-05
down
wechat
bug