当前位置: X-MOL 学术The International Journal of Evidence & Proof › 论文详情
Admissibility of confession evidence: Principles of hearsay and the rule of voluntariness
The International Journal of Evidence & Proof Pub Date : 2021-04-04 , DOI: 10.1177/13657127211002287
Jennifer Porter

The common law test of voluntariness has come to be associated with important policy rationales including the privilege against self-incrimination. However, when the test originated more than a century ago, it was a test concerned specifically with the truthfulness of confession evidence; which evidence was at that time adduced in the form of indirect oral testimony, that is, as hearsay. Given that, a century later, confession evidence is now mostly adduced in the form of an audiovisual recording that can be observed directly by the trial judge, rather than as indirect oral testimony, there may be capacity for a different emphasis regarding the question of admissibility. This article considers the law currently operating in Western Australia, Queensland and South Australia to see whether or not, in the form of an audiovisual recording, the exercise of judicial discretion as to the question of the admissibility of confession evidence might be supported if the common law test of voluntariness was not a strict test of exclusion.



中文翻译:

认罪证据的可采性:传闻证据的原则和自愿原则

普通法对自愿性的检验已经与重要的政策依据相关联,其中包括反对自我追究权的特权。但是,当这个测试起源于一个多世纪以前时,它是一个专门与认罪证据的真实性有关的测试。当时以间接口头证词的形式(即传闻)援引了哪些证据。鉴于一个世纪后,认罪证据现在大多以视听记录的形式提供,可由初审法官直接观察,而不是作为间接口头证词,对于可否受理问题可能有不同的强调能力。本文考虑了目前在西澳大利亚州,昆士兰州和南澳大利亚州实施的法律,以视听记录的形式查看是否

更新日期:2021-04-05
全部期刊列表>>
2021中国学者有奖调研
JACS
材料科学跨学科高质量前沿研究
中国作者高影响力研究精选
虚拟特刊
屿渡论文,编辑服务
何川
清华大学
郭维
上海中医药大学
华东师范大学
北京大学许言
楚甲祥
西湖石航
上海交大
北理工
隐藏1h前已浏览文章
课题组网站
新版X-MOL期刊搜索和高级搜索功能介绍
ACS材料视界
南开大学
张韶光
华辉
天合科研
x-mol收录
试剂库存
down
wechat
bug