The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) is a global standard that aims to improve governance quality in the extractive industries sector, particularly through enhanced transparency, participation and accountability. This article analyses to what extent and how the EITI improves governance quality and thereby addresses the environmental and social impacts from extractive industries in Indonesia, a country with pronounced conflicts over natural resources. Drawing on semi-structured interviews and analyses of EITI meeting minutes and reports, we conclude that the implementation of the EITI in Indonesia helped to strengthen civil society participation and empowerment to engage in extractive industry governance, both within and beyond the EITI-Indonesia multi-stakeholder group. The EITI falls short, however, in enhancing transparency and accountability due to important limitations in the information disclosure and misalignment between the country's decentralised governance of extractive industries and the EITI's national implementation. This also means that environmental and social impacts have not become subject to serious debates within the multi-stakeholder group. We lay out some broader policy and research implications and argue that both policymakers and scholars should look beyond the narrow scope of the EITI requirements and consider the EITI's success in light of its ability to foster wider governance reforms.

采掘业透明度倡议 (EITI) 是一项全球标准，旨在提高采掘业部门的治理质量，特别是通过提高透明度、参与度和问责制。本文分析了 EITI 在多大程度上以及如何提高治理质量，从而解决印度尼西亚采掘业对环境和社会的影响，印度尼西亚是一个自然资源冲突明显的国家。通过对 EITI 会议记录和报告的半结构化访谈和分析，我们得出结论，EITI 在印度尼西亚的实施有助于加强民间社会的参与和授权，以参与 EITI-印度尼西亚多国组织内外的采掘业治理。利益相关者群体。然而，EITI 不足，由于信息披露的重要限制以及国家对采掘业的分散治理与 EITI 的国家实施之间的错位，在提高透明度和问责制方面。这也意味着环境和社会影响尚未成为多利益相关者群体内部严肃辩论的主题。我们列出了一些更广泛的政策和研究影响，并认为政策制定者和学者都应该超越 EITI 要求的狭窄范围，并根据其促进更广泛治理改革的能力来考虑 EITI 的成功。这也意味着环境和社会影响尚未成为多利益相关者群体内部严肃辩论的主题。我们列出了一些更广泛的政策和研究影响，并认为政策制定者和学者都应该超越 EITI 要求的狭窄范围，并根据其促进更广泛治理改革的能力来考虑 EITI 的成功。这也意味着环境和社会影响尚未成为多利益相关者群体内部严肃辩论的主题。我们列出了一些更广泛的政策和研究影响，并认为政策制定者和学者都应该超越 EITI 要求的狭窄范围，并根据其促进更广泛治理改革的能力来考虑 EITI 的成功。