Discourse on the normative use of reflexivity predominates in the professional literature. Expert articles on the topic of non-normative use of reflexivity, which is based on the presumption that social workers do not use reflexivity to improve their work quality, but rather its functions for themselves to fulfil specific purposes, is missing, with some exceptions in the literature. The presented article therefore aims to understand the use of reflexivity in the practice of social work with families in its non-normative concept and to determine the implications for social work. Using the abduction method (in which Schechtman’s narrative identity theory was applied to data analysis), the following four categories of the use of reflexivity in a non-normative way were saturated with data obtained from initial interviews, field observations and subsequent reflection of field observations with social workers: personal interest, survival, moral responsibility and compensation. The non-normative concept of reflexivity is further discussed in the context of specific implications for education and practice of social work.

中文翻译：

---

在捷克共和国与家人的社会工作中非规范地使用反身性

在专业文献中，对反身性规范使用的论述占主导地位。缺少关于非规范性使用反身性这一主题的专家文章，该文章基于这样的假设，即社会工作者没有使用反身性来提高他们的工作质量，而是为了实现特定目的而行使其功能，但以下方面存在一些例外：文献。因此，本文旨在了解自反性在与家庭进行的社会工作实践中的非规范性概念，并确定其对社会工作的影响。使用绑架方法（将Schechtman的叙事同一性理论应用于数据分析），以下四类以非规范性方式使用自反性的方法被初始访谈获得的数据所饱和，实地观察以及随后与社会工作者进行的实地观察：个人利益，生存，道德责任和补偿。在对社会工作的教育和实践产生具体影响的背景下，进一步讨论了反身性的非规范性概念。