Theoretical conceptualizations of “aggressive-victims” portray them as more emotionally dysregulated and socially inept than adolescents who are either aggressive or victimized. The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize the literature comparing the psychosocial adjustment of aggressor/victim subgroups (i.e., aggressive-victims, predominant-aggressors, predominant-victims, and youth with limited involvement) and determine whether empirical findings are consistent with theory, particularly regarding whether aggressive-victims possess unique and shared characteristics relative to those with other patterns of involvement in aggression. This review focuses on studies with early adolescent samples given the heightened vulnerability for aggression and victimization and the need for more effective interventions during this developmental period. A systematic search of three databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Academic Search Complete) identified 25 studies, which varied in their sample characteristics, approach to defining subgroups, and findings regarding the unique and shared characteristics of aggressive-victims. I propose several guidelines for future research in this area and highlight several gaps in our existing knowledge. Implications for theory and prevention efforts are discussed.

“攻击性受害者”的理论概念将他们描述为比攻击性或受害青少年更情绪失调和社交无能。本系统综述的目的是综合比较攻击者/受害者亚群（即攻击性受害者、主要攻击者、主要受害者和参与有限的青年）的社会心理调整的文献，并确定实证结果是否与理论一致，特别是关于侵略性受害者是否具有与其他参与侵略模式的人相比具有独特和共同的特征。鉴于早期青少年样本的攻击和受害脆弱性以及在此发育时期需要更有效的干预措施，本综述侧重于对早期青少年样本的研究。对三个数据库（PubMed、PsycINFO、Academic Search Complete）进行系统搜索，确定了 25 项研究，这些研究在样本特征、定义亚组的方法以及关于攻击性受害者的独特和共同特征的发现方面各不相同。我为该领域的未来研究提出了几项指导方针，并强调了我们现有知识中的几个差距。讨论了对理论和预防工作的影响。以及关于攻击性受害者的独特和共同特征的发现。我为该领域的未来研究提出了几项指导方针，并强调了我们现有知识中的几个差距。讨论了对理论和预防工作的影响。以及关于攻击性受害者的独特和共同特征的发现。我为该领域的未来研究提出了几项指导方针，并强调了我们现有知识中的几个差距。讨论了对理论和预防工作的影响。