Abstract

We identify the main themes raised in the commentaries and respond. To summarize: Yes, there were problems with social priming (and most other psychological) research; yes, the definition of social priming matters; no, cherry-picking specific studies to replicate does not amount to a systematic examination of the relevant research; yes, within-subjects social priming studies are robust; yes, it is wrong to conflate research reproducibility and misconduct; and, yes, it was personal.

中文翻译：

---

关于火车残骸的最后一句话

摘要

我们确定评论中提出的主要主题并做出回应。总结：是的，社会启动（和大多数其他心理学）研究存在问题；是的，社会启动的定义很重要；不可以，挑剔重复的具体研究并不意味着对相关研究进行系统的检查；是的，受试者内部的社会启动研究是可靠的；是的，将研究的可重复性和不当行为混为一谈是错误的；是的，这是个人的。