This study examined the effect of different coaching conditions on the magnitude and reliability of drop jump height in men and women. Nineteen collegiate sport sciences students (10 men) performed two sets of 10 drop jumps under four different coaching conditions: neutral, augmented feedback, external focus of attention, and a combination of augmented feedback and external focus of attention. The augmented feedback condition revealed a significantly higher jump height than the neutral condition (p = .002), while no significant differences were observed for the remaining conditions (p ≥ .38). The external focus of attention condition was more reliable than the neutral and augmented feedback conditions (coefficient of variation_ratio ≥ 1.15), while no differences were observed between the remaining conditions. These results suggest that both the magnitude and reliability of the drop jump height performance are influenced by the coaching condition.

这项研究检查了不同教练条件对男女跳高下降幅度和可靠性的影响。19名大学体育科学专业的学生（10名男子）在四种不同的教练条件下进行了两组10次跳下动作：中性，增强反馈，外部关注焦点以及增强反馈与外部关注焦点的组合。增强反馈条件透出显著更高跳跃高度比中性条件（p  = 0.002），而观察到对剩余的条件下（没有显著差异p  ≥0.38）。的注意状态的外部聚焦比中性和增强反馈条件更可靠的（变异系数_比 ≥1.15），而其余条件之间未观察到差异。这些结果表明，下降跳高表现的大小和可靠性都受教练条件的影响。