Foundations of Science ( IF 0.9 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-31 , DOI: 10.1007/s10699-020-09773-y Hans-Jörg Rheinberger
Hub Zwart’s article is about the idea—and the practice—of an embedded philosophy of science, that is, a philosophy participating in and at the same time reflecting about the current state of the sciences facing the Anthropocene, to which I am very sympathetic. There are, however, two caveats. The first is that participation is always in danger to end up in a more or less uncritical eulogy, in the present case of synthetic biology. The second is that I have doubts about packing the historical path of scientific development into the Procrustes bed of Hegelian dialectics. This usually leads to one or the other form of teleology.
中文翻译:
哈勃·兹沃特(Hub Zwart)对“人类世间的技术辩证法实践”的评论
哈勃·兹沃特(Hub Zwart)的文章是关于一种嵌入式科学哲学的思想和实践的,即一种参与并同时反映人类世代科学现状的哲学,对此我非常同情。但是,有两个警告。首先是,在合成生物学的当前情况下,参与总是有可能或多或少地受到非批判性颂词的威胁。其次,我对将科学发展的历史道路纳入黑格尔辩证法的Procrustes床感到怀疑。这通常导致一种或另一种目的论。