This article is a preliminary presentation of conjunctive paraconsistency, the claim that there might be non-explosive true contradictions, but contradictory propositions cannot be considered separately true. In case of true ‘p and not p’, the conjuncts must be held untrue, Simplification fails. The conjunctive approach is dual to non-adjunctive conceptions of inconsistency, informed by the idea that there might be cases in which a proposition is true and its negation is true too, but the conjunction is untrue, Adjunction fails. While non-adjunctivism is a well-known option, the other view is not so much studied nowadays, but it was not unknown in the tradition, and there are some positive suggestions, in recent literature, that the position is plausible and deserves to be developed. The article compares conjunctivism, non-adjunctivism and dialetheism, then focuses on some possible justifications, costs and benefits of the conjunctive view.

本文是合取超一致性的初步介绍，声称可能存在非爆炸性的真实矛盾，但不能将矛盾主张单独视为真实。如果为真“ p而非p”，则必须使合取词不成立，否则简化将失败。合并方法是不一致的非双重概念的对偶，这是基于这样的想法，即，在某些情况下，命题是正确的，否定命题也是正确的，但是合取是不正确的，则合并失败。尽管非附加主义是一种众所周知的选择，但如今对另一种观点的研究还不多，但在传统中却并不陌生，并且在最近的文献中有一些积极的建议认为这一立场是合理的，值得我们去探讨。发达。本文比较了结语，非结语和辩证法，然后重点介绍了一些可能的理由，