Eleven Korean supervisors were interviewed about their unsatisfactory supervisory experiences (USEs) and the interview data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. These results were presented within a broader framework that considered the cultural context in which the supervision was occurring and its effects on relationship dynamics, as well as the supervisory context in which those supervisors were working. Supervisors reported a range of USEs, including supervisee’s failure to learn and supervisees’ negative reactions to the supervisors as well as coping strategies they employed in response (e.g., suppressing negative emotions and continuing supervision). Most USEs were unresolved and the supervisors came to provide rigorous structuring as well as screening potential supervisees who might bring USEs. The results are discussed in the context and current status of clinical supervision in Korea and implications of these findings for supervision, training and research in the world.

对11名韩国主管进行了面试，以了解他们的监督经验（USE）不令人满意，并使用扎根的理论方法对面试数据进行了分析。这些结果是在一个更广泛的框架内提出的，该框架考虑了进行监督的文化背景及其对关系动态的影响，以及那些监督人员工作的监督环境。监督者报告了一系列使用情况，包括监督者学习失败和被监督者对监督者的负面反应，以及他们所采取的应对策略（例如，抑制负面情绪和持续监督）。大多数USE尚未解决，主管人员进行了严格的结构设计，并筛选了可能带来USE的潜在监管人员。