Comparing analytic activity to a spaceship launching, Laplanche (1999 Laplanche, J. (1999). Essays on Otherness. J. Fletcher, trans. & ed. NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar], pp. 231-232) suggested that there are “windows;” opportune interpretative moments. Laplanche emphasized the enduring impact of intergenerational “enigmatic messages,” such that all individuals cope with an essential “alterity” (otherness to oneself). He did not consider the countertransference implications. I propose that the analyst must also open the self-reflective window and pass through “originary situations” to prepare for intervention. In accordance with Kaes’ (2007 Kaes, R. (2007). Linking, Alliances and Shared Spaces. Groups and the Psychoanalyst. London: International Psychoanalysis Library. [Google Scholar], p. 98) formulation that “the unconscious is structured like a group,” I illustrate how unique windows of opportunity exist in psychoanalytic group treatment. Sharing and competing in a therapeutic space with “like me’s,” group members reexperience intense “horizontal” as well as “vertical” transferences, as does its leader. Clinical examples illustrate my efforts to mediate among interacting “translations” of early developmental experience—mine as well as other group members—to understand emerging psychic material.

将分析活动与宇宙飞船发射进行比较，Laplanche（1999 年） 拉普朗什，J.（1999 年）。关于他者的论文。J.弗莱彻，反式。＆编辑。纽约：劳特里奇。 [Google Scholar] , pp. 231-232) 建议有“窗户”；合适的解释时刻。拉普朗什强调了代际“神秘信息”的持久影响，因此所有个人都应对基本的“另类”（对自己的他者）。他没有考虑反移情的影响。我建议分析师也必须打开自我反省的窗口，并通过“原始情况”来准备干预。根据 Kaes' (2007 凯斯，R.（2007 年）。链接、联盟和共享空间。团体和精神分析学家。伦敦：国际精神分析图书馆。 [谷歌学术]，p。98）“无意识的结构像一个群体”的表述，我说明了在精神分析群体治疗中是如何存在独特的机会之窗的。在与“像我一样”的治疗空间中分享和竞争，小组成员重新体验强烈的“水平”和“垂直”移情，其领导者也是如此。临床例子说明了我努力在早期发展经验的相互作用“翻译”之间进行调解——我的以及其他小组成员——以理解新兴的心理材料。