Abstract

This paper shows that humans perceive the value of paintings made by AI as lower than the value of those made by humans when the creator of the work is known. This phenomenon occurs regardless of which style (figurative or abstract) the evaluated paintings have. The negative impact of the information that AI is the author of a painting is mediated by the author’s artistry (AA) and the overall impression (OI) the painting makes on participants. Moreover, it was found that people use context cues when assessing paintings made by humans and AI. The perceived value of a painting increases when the information about the value of the painting made by AI was provided as a context cue, indicating that people exclude works created by AI from the category of human-made art. The method used in the research is an experiment made with 296 respondents (42.6% female). The age of the participants ranged between 18 and 62 (M = 35.30, SD = 10.76).

摘要

本文表明，当人们知道该作品的创造者时，人们认为人工智能制作的画作的价值要低于人类创作的画作的价值。无论所评估的绘画具有哪种风格（象征性或抽象性），都会发生这种现象。AI是绘画作者的信息的负面影响是由作者的艺术性（AA）和绘画对参与者的整体印象（OI）所介导的。此外，还发现人们在评估人类和AI的绘画时会使用上下文提示。当提供有关AI制成的绘画的价值的信息作为上下文提示时，绘画的感知价值会增加，这表明人们将AI创作的作品从人造艺术类别中排除了。研究中使用的方法是由296名受访者进行的实验（42。6％的女性）。参与者的年龄在18到62岁之间（M = 35.30，SD = 10.76）。