Carl Schmitt’s The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum (1950) undertook a re-interpretation of the modern origins of the discipline of international law, placing Vitoria at its pivot, as the Spanish international law professor Camilo Barcia Trelles (1888–1977) had done before. Barcia’s work had a strong influence on some of the seminal pieces on international law and geopolitics that Schmitt wrote in the period from 1941 to 1950. This was the case for Schmitt’s historical mythology of the opposition between sea and earth and its juridical consequence, his doctrine of the Grossraum, which had as its basis Barcia’s account of the Monroe Doctrine, and also of Schmitt’s critique of the ‘discrimination of war’ formalized in the Kellogg–Briand Pact. According to Barcia, the exclusion of European powers from the American continent by the United States as a rising hegemon was transformed – thanks to its domination of the sea – into the global reach of a world police power. Barcia did not agree with Brown Scott’s transformation of international law through American liberal internationalism into ‘modern international law’. While Brown Scott and Schmitt were competing for two opposing vernaculars of the discipline in search for a new definition and to shape it, Barcia was instrumental in the opposed efforts of these two apparently very dissimilar representatives of international law by ushering Vitoria into their service.

中文翻译：

---

卡米洛·巴西亚·特雷莱斯谈弗朗西斯科·德·维多利亚：在卡尔·施密特的格罗斯拉姆和詹姆斯·布朗·斯科特的“现代国际法”的十字路口

卡尔·施密特 (Carl Schmitt) 的《欧洲公共法》国际法中的地球规则 (1950) 对国际法学科的现代起源进行了重新解释，将维多利亚作为其支点，正如西班牙国际法教授卡米洛·巴西亚·特雷勒斯 (Camilo Barcia Trelles) （1888-1977）以前做过。巴西亚的著作对施密特在 1941 年至 1950 年期间撰写的有关国际法和地缘政治的一些开创性作品产生了强烈影响。施密特关于海地对立的历史神话及其法律后果，即他的学说，就是这种情况。 Grossraum 的基础是 Barcia 对门罗主义的描述，以及施密特对《凯洛格-布里安条约》中正式规定的“战争歧视”的批评。根据巴西亚的说法，美国作为一个崛起的霸主将欧洲大国排除在美洲大陆之外，这得益于其对海洋的统治，转变为世界警察大国的全球影响力。巴西亚不同意布朗斯科特通过美国自由国际主义将国际法转变为“现代国际法”。当布朗·斯科特和施密特为寻找新定义和塑造新定义而竞争该学科的两个对立方言时，巴西亚通过引导维多利亚为他们服务，在这两个显然非常不同的国际法代表的反对努力中发挥了重要作用。巴西亚不同意布朗斯科特通过美国自由国际主义将国际法转变为“现代国际法”。当布朗·斯科特和施密特为寻找新定义和塑造新定义而竞争该学科的两个对立方言时，巴西亚通过引导维多利亚为他们服务，在这两个显然非常不同的国际法代表的反对努力中发挥了重要作用。巴西亚不同意布朗斯科特通过美国自由国际主义将国际法转变为“现代国际法”。当布朗·斯科特和施密特为寻找新定义和塑造新定义而竞争该学科的两个对立方言时，巴西亚通过引导维多利亚为他们服务，在这两个显然非常不同的国际法代表的反对努力中发挥了重要作用。