In response to Erik Rietveld’s text “The affordances of art for making technologies,” this commentary probes art’s affordances for what Rietveld calls behavioral “changeability.” I ask, how can a view of art’s affordances help to better understand collective and relational affects and habitual behaviors? Can artworks help to “radically change the affordances available in our surroundings,” to generate collective social action and behavioral change?

中文翻译：

---

站起来，站起来：艺术的坐立不安的承受能力

为了回应埃里克·里特维尔德（Erik Rietveld）的文章“艺术对技术的支持”，该评论探讨了里特维尔（Rietveld）所谓的行为“可变性”的艺术支持。我想问一下，如何看待艺术品的能力如何更好地理解集体和关系的影响以及习惯行为？艺术品可以帮助“彻底改变我们周围环境的可用能力”，以产生集体的社会行为和行为改变吗？