Public order as a protectable interest is an important criterion for determining a consistent and rational scope of crimes against public order. From the specific perspective of everyday life, Feinberg's theory of minimum welfare interests neglects those kinds of interests that relate to a smooth or harmonious life. Socio-legal perspectives make it clear that safety interests, which directly concern basic living (bodily existence), do not include various kinds of order interests – and thus life order interests in convenience, comfort and peace, distinguishable from safety interests that are protected by English public order laws, can be construed as the public order interest. By critically adopting Feinberg's individualistic approach to analysing public interests in three types of case, the test of being public is further clarified. Typical categories of public order are socially and normatively identified before concluding with a discussion of the effects the identification made by the paper might make to the scope and nature of public order law and offences.

中文翻译：

---

作为可保护利益的公共秩序

公共秩序作为一种受保护的利益，是确定危害公共秩序犯罪范围一致、合理的重要标准。从日常生活的具体角度来看，范伯格的最低福利利益理论忽略了那些与顺利或和谐生活相关的利益。社会法律视角明确指出，直接关系到基本生活（身体存在）的安全利益不包括各种秩序利益——因此，方便、舒适、安宁的生活秩序利益与受法律保护的安全利益不同。英国的公共秩序法，可以理解为公共秩序利益。通过批判性地采用范伯格的个人主义方法对三类案件的公共利益进行分析，进一步明确了公开性的检验标准。