Background:

Heralded as a teaching, assessment and reflective tool, and increasingly as a longitudinal and holistic perspective of the educator’s development, medical educator’s portfolios (MEP)s are increasingly employed to evaluate progress, assess for promotions and career switches, used as a reflective tool and as a means of curating educational activities. However, despite its blossoming role, there is significant dissonance in the content and structure of MEPs. As such, a systematic scoping review (SSR) is proposed to identify what is known of MEPs and its contents.

Methods:

Krishna’s Systematic Evidenced Based Approach (SEBA) was adopted to structure this SSR in SEBA of MEPs. SEBA’s constructivist approach and relativist lens allow data from a variety of sources to be considered to paint a holistic picture of available information on MEPs.

Results:

From the 12 360 abstracts reviewed, 768 full text articles were evaluated, and 79 articles were included. Concurrent thematic and content analysis revealed similar themes and categories including: (1) Definition and Functions of MEPs, (2) Implementing and Assessing MEPs, (3) Strengths and limitations of MEPs and (4) electronic MEPs.

Discussion:

This SSR in SEBA proffers a novel 5-staged evidence-based approach to constructing MEPs which allows for consistent application and assessment of MEPs. This 5-stage approach pivots on assessing and verifying the achievement of developmental milestones or ‘micro-competencies’ that facilitate micro-credentialling and effective evaluation of a medical educator’s development and entrust-ability. This allows MEPs to be used as a reflective and collaborative tool and a basis for career planning.

中文翻译：

---

医学教育工作者组合的系统范围界定审查

背景：

作为一种教学、评估和反思工具，以及越来越多地作为教育者发展的纵向和整体视角，医学教育者的投资组合 (MEP) 越来越多地用于评估进展、评估晋升和职业转换，用作反思工具和作为策划教育活动的一种手段。然而，尽管它的作用正在蓬勃发展，但欧洲议会议员的内容和结构却存在显着的不协调。因此，建议进行系统范围审查 (SSR) 以确定已知的 MEP 及其内容。

方法：

Krishna 的系统循证方法 (SEBA) 被用于在欧洲议会议员的 SEBA 中构建此 SSR。SEBA 的建构主义方法和相对主义视角允许考虑来自各种来源的数据，以描绘关于 MEP 的可用信息的整体图景。

结果：

从审查的 12 360 篇摘要中，评估了 768 篇全文文章，其中 79 篇文章被纳入。同时进行的主题和内容分析揭示了相似的主题和类别，包括：（1）欧洲议会议员的定义和职能，（2）欧洲议会议员的实施和评估，（3）欧洲议会议员的优势和局限性以及（4）电子欧洲议会议员。

讨论：

SEBA 中的此 SSR 提供​​了一种新颖的 5 阶段循证方法来构建 MEP，该方法允许对 MEP 进行一致的应用和评估。这种 5 阶段方法的重点是评估和验证发展里程碑或“微观能力”的实现，这些成就有助于对医学教育者的发展和委托能力进行微观认证和有效评估。这使得欧洲议会议员可以用作反思和协作工具以及职业规划的基础。