当前位置: X-MOL 学术Pastoral Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A Systematic Literature Review of Equanimity in Mindfulness Based Interventions
Pastoral Psychology ( IF 0.8 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-23 , DOI: 10.1007/s11089-021-00945-6
Joey Weber

Despite the plethora of mindfulness research, it has been suggested that equanimity has been largely ignored. Current research has sought to add greater precision to this construct. The objectives of this systematic literature review were (1) to identify whether equanimity is being recognized as a key facet in mindfulness-based interventions and (2) to evaluate the effectiveness of equanimity as a construct in psychiatric health. The data sources were ProQuest Central and SCOPUS. A systematic literature review was conducted of peer-reviewed research articles published between 2010 and 2018. Nine studies identified equanimity as a key facet in mindfulness interventions in relation to mental health interventions. The review found that there is limited standardized inclusion of equanimity and poor reliability and generalizability surrounding this construct. Furthermore, there are no explicit instruments for measuring equanimity. More research is needed in mental health intervention to develop clarity over the impact of equanimity on well-being and psychiatric health. Further, psychometric measures for the construct are limited. The wide variety of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) raises the question of how explicitly equanimity is communicated. There is also a general lack of understanding and clarity regarding its operational definition. Often, equanimity can be synonymous with the terms nonjudgment or decentering. This systematic literature review aimed to address these gaps in the literature.



中文翻译:

基于正念干预的系统性文献综述

尽管进行了大量的正念研究,但有人建议在很大程度上忽略了镇定。当前的研究试图为这种结构增加更高的精度。这篇系统的文献综述的目的是(1)确定是否在基于正念的干预措施中公认平等是关键方面,以及(2)评估平等在精神卫生中的有效性。数据来源是ProQuest Central和SCOPUS。对2010年至2018年期间发表的经过同行评审的研究文章进行了系统的文献综述。九项研究将宁静作为与心理健康干预相关的正念干预的一个重要方面。审查发现,围绕此构造的等效性的标准化包含有限,可靠性和可概括性较差。此外,还没有明确的工具可以衡量宁静程度。在精神卫生干预方面还需要进行更多研究,以弄清安宁对幸福感和精神病健康的影响。此外,该构造物的心理测度方法是有限的。基于正念的干预措施(MBI)种类繁多,引发了一个问题,即如何明确传达镇静感。对于其操作定义也普遍缺乏理解和明确性。通常,镇定可以与术语“非判断”或“偏心”同义。这篇系统的文献综述旨在解决文献中的这些空白。没有明确的手段来衡量宁静。在精神卫生干预方面还需要进行更多研究,以弄清安宁对幸福感和精神病健康的影响。此外,该构造物的心理测度方法是有限的。基于正念的干预措施(MBI)种类繁多,引发了一个问题,即如何明确传达镇静感。对于其操作定义也普遍缺乏理解和明确性。通常,镇定可以与术语“非判断”或“偏心”同义。这篇系统的文献综述旨在解决文献中的这些空白。没有明确的手段来衡量宁静。在精神卫生干预方面还需要进行更多研究,以弄清安宁对幸福感和精神病健康的影响。此外,该构造物的心理测度方法是有限的。基于正念的干预措施(MBI)种类繁多,引发了一个问题,即如何明确传达镇静感。对于其操作定义也普遍缺乏理解和明确性。通常,镇定可以与术语“非判断”或“偏心”同义。这篇系统的文献综述旨在解决文献中的这些空白。构造的心理测评方法是有限的。基于正念的干预措施(MBI)种类繁多,引发了一个问题,即如何明确传达镇静感。对于其操作定义也普遍缺乏理解和明确性。通常,镇定可以与术语“非判断”或“偏心”同义。这篇系统的文献综述旨在解决文献中的这些空白。构造的心理测评方法是有限的。基于正念的干预措施(MBI)种类繁多,引发了一个问题,即如何明确传达镇静感。对于其操作定义也普遍缺乏理解和明确性。通常,镇定可以与术语“非判断”或“偏心”同义。这篇系统的文献综述旨在解决文献中的这些空白。

更新日期:2021-03-23
down
wechat
bug