当前位置: X-MOL 学术Health Educ. Res. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Short- and long-term effects of the patient education strategy—learning and coping—in cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial (LC-REHAB)
Health Education Research ( IF 2.1 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-20 , DOI: 10.1093/her/cyaa051
V Lynggaard 1 , A D Zwisler 2 , R S Taylor 2, 3 , O May 4 , J Mortensen 5 , C V Nielsen 6, 7
Affiliation  

The objectives were to assess the short- and long-term effect of the patient education strategy ‘Learning and Coping’ (LC) in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on health-related quality of life, patient education impact, cardiac risk factors and lifestyle. In total, 825 patients hospitalized with ischaemic heart disease or heart failure were randomized to either LC-CR or standard CR at three Danish hospitals. Teaching approach in LC-CR was situational, inductive and reflective, with experienced patients as co-educators and supplemental interviews. Teaching approach in standard CR was structured and deductive. Outcomes were assessed immediately after CR, and after 3 months (short term), and after 3 years (long term). Between-arm differences in favour of LC-CR were SF-12 ‘role emotional’ (3.7, 95% CI: 0.6–6.8) and MDI depression score (0.9, 0.1–1.8) immediately after CR, exercise capacity (4 W, 1–9) at 3 months and SF-12 ‘role physical’ (4.6, 0.1–9.0) (long term). Between-arm differences in favour of controls were waist circumference (−1.7 cm, −2.3 to −1.0) immediately after CR and HeiQ domain ‘Constructive attitudes and approaches’ (0.11, 0.04–0.18), triglycerides (−0.12 mmol/l, −0.21 to −0.02), systolic blood pressure (−3.12 mmHg, −5.66 to −0.58) at 3 months. Adding LC strategies to CR provides inconsistent short-term results but improves ‘role physical’ long term.

中文翻译:

在心脏康复中,患者教育策略(学习和应对)的短期和长期效果:随机对照试验(LC-REHAB)

目的是评估心脏康复(CR)中患者教育策略“学习与应对”(LC)对与健康相关的生活质量,患者教育影响,心脏危险因素和生活方式的短期和长期影响。在丹麦的三家医院中,总共将825例因缺血性心脏病或心力衰竭住院的患者随机分为LC-CR或标准CR。LC-CR的教学方法是情境式,归纳式和反思式的,经验丰富的患者担任共同教育者和补充访谈。标准CR的教学方法是结构化和演绎性的。在CR后,3个月后(短期)和3年后(长期)立即评估结局。臂间差异支持LC-CR的是SF-12“角色情感”(3.7,95%CI:0.6-6.8)和MDI抑郁评分(0.9,0.1-1)。8)CR后,立即进行3个月的运动能力(4 W,1–9)和SF-12的“角色生理”(4.6,0.1–9.0)(长期)。有利于对照的手臂间差异是紧随CR和HeiQ域“建设性态度和方法”(0.11、0.04-0.18)之后的腰围(-1.7 cm,-2.3至-1.0),甘油三酸酯(-0.12 mmol / l, -0.21至-0.02),3个月时的收缩压(-3.12 mmHg,-5.66至-0.58)。在CR中添加LC策略会产生不一致的短期结果,但会改善长期的“角色物理”。-0.21至-0.02),3个月时的收缩压(-3.12 mmHg,-5.66至-0.58)。在CR中添加LC策略会产生不一致的短期结果,但会改善长期的“角色物理”。-0.21至-0.02),3个月时的收缩压(-3.12 mmHg,-5.66至-0.58)。在CR中添加LC策略会产生不一致的短期结果,但会改善长期的“角色物理”。
更新日期:2021-03-23
down
wechat
bug