Research indicating many study results do not replicate has raised questions about the credibility of science and prompted concerns about a potential reproducibility crisis. Moreover, most published research is not freely accessible, which limits the potential impact of science. Open science, which aims to make the research process more open and reproducible, has been proposed as one approach to increase the credibility and impact of scientific research. Although relatively little attention has been paid to open science in relation to single-case design, we propose that open-science practices can be applied to enhance the credibility and impact of single-case design research. In this article, we discuss how open-science practices align with other recent developments in single-case design research, describe four prominent open-science practices (i.e., preregistration, registered reports, data and materials sharing, and open access), and discuss potential benefits and limitations of each practice for single-case design.

研究表明许多研究结果无法复制，这项研究引起了人们对科学可信度的质疑，并引发了人们对潜在的可再现性危机的担忧。此外，大多数已发表的研究不是免费获取的，这限制了科学的潜在影响。开放科学旨在提高研究过程的开放性和可重复性，已被提出来作为提高科学研究的可信度和影响力的一种方法。尽管与单案例设计相关的开放科学很少受到关注，但我们建议可以采用开放科学实践来提高单案例设计研究的可信度和影响力。在本文中，我们讨论了开放式科学实践如何与单案例设计研究中的其他最新发展相吻合，描述了四种著名的开放式科学实践（i。